Viewing problems? Click here.

Chatham Citizens for Effective Communities - CCEC
 

February/March
Volume 2, Issue 2

 

Special Public Hearing on Gas Exploration and Fracking Monday, April 2

Recent Proceedings of County Government:

A Vote for Water Quality!

Charter School Resolution

State of the County

Joint Cary-Chatham Land-Use Plan


Special Public Hearing on Gas Exploration and Fracking Monday, April 2

Thanks to Commissioner Sally Kost, a special public infomation session on gas exploration and fracking in North Carolina will be conducted by staff from the state Department of Environmental and Natural Resources on Monday, April 2, at 6:30 p.m., at The Barn at Fearrington Village.

DENR has held two other recent hearings, in Sanford and Chapel Hill. No hearing had been planned for Chatham, but Commissioner Kost asked DENR to schedule a hearing for our county as well, which could be profoundly affected if current state law is changed to allow hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"). Shale deposits thought to contain natural gas are located in Chatham and Lee Counties, and many landowners have already signed lease agreements that would allow gas extraction from their properties.

Surprisingly, although DENR is a state department, no notification of this hearing has been posted to the Chatham County website at the time of this writing.

Staff from DENR will summarize their study and report on fracking, and will receive comments from the public on Monday night.

Written comments will be accepted until 11:59 p.m. April 2 and may be sent via email to: shale_gas_comments@ncdenr.gov

or by regular mail to:

NCDENR
Attn: Trina Ozer
1601 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699


A Vote for Water Quality!

On February 20 the Chatham County Board of Commissioners held a public hearing on their requested text amendment to the Watershed Protection Ordinance (WPO). The request came about after consultants for a development corporation asked that the buffering requirement for seeps and springs be removed, and that the rating for ephemerals that require buffering be raised from 3 to 15. (The state rating system categorizes streams based on scientific criteria. Ephemeral streams are rated as 1–18; at 19, a stream is classified as intermittent. For extensive background, see our November and January newsletters.)

During the November 21st 2012 BOC meeting, county Environmental Quality Department (EQD) staff (Dan LaMontage and Chris Hopper) followed up on the request from the BOC. They recommended elimination of any reference to seeps and springs in the WPO, contending that they are already designated as wetlands, which must be buffered. Additionally, they recommended raising the treshhold for requiring buffering of ephemeral streams from the current 3 to 10, based on state studies. The BOC countered with a “compromise” rating of 15. Following this meeting, the request went before Environmental Review Committee (ERC), which determined that a rating of 15 was not adequate to protect headwater streams, but split (3 to 3) on whether to recommend a rating of 5 or 10.

Fourteen speakers spoke in opposition to the request during the February public hearing, citing scientific data and historical watershed degradation before buffer rules were in place. Elaine Chiosso of the Haw River Assembly presented a PowerPoint presentation with photos of mud flowing into creeks, the Haw River, and Jordan Lake, which was directly attributable to development projects upstream. No one spoke in favor. EQD director Dan LaMontagne reviewed the staff recommendations. Vic D’Amato, Chair of the ERC, reported his committee’s recommendations. Sally Kost made a very strong statement in favor of retaining the rules.

Both Brian Bock and Walter Petty stated that they did not intend to lessen environmental protections, to which Sally responded that no matter how many times they said that, it did not make it true. Pam Stewart asserted that Chatham’s polluted waters come from counties upstream, although the PowerPoint presentation shown by Elain Chiosso clearly showed pollution and run-off from Chatham County developments.

The BOC voted 3 to 2 (with Cross and Kost dissenting) to accept all of the staff and ERC recommendations except for the rating of ephemerals that should be buffered, which they arbitrarily changed to 15, with no scientific reasoning for doing so. It appeared at that point that the majority BOC was so fully committed to predetermined actions (dictated by ideology) that no amount of public input or scientific data could sway them.

But then something else happened. The majority of those attending were displeased and restive.  Chairman Bock hastily called for a 5-minute break, and when the Board reconvened, they called for a repeat vote. Ultimately, they voted unanimously to adopt the recommendations of their staff and the ERC in their entirety, including a 10 rating for buffering ephemeral streams.

CCEC had requested that the Watershed Ordinance not be altered, but we are satisfied with this compromise and pleased that important headwater streams will continue to be buffered at a level that significantly protects water resources. Therefore, we thank the BOC for accepting scientific rationale, in spite of their firm beliefs that environmental protection is not a core function of government.

Caroline Siverson

Back to top


The Charter School Resolution

Also at the Feb. 20th regular meeting, the BOC voted to pass a resolution to support charter schools in Chatham County. The resolution, which can be read on the county website, basically says that the BOC thanks Chatham’s charter schools and encourages the opening of new ones. 

In preparation for this vote, the BOC invited the pro-charter school nonprofit organaization Parents for Freedom to make a presentation that favorably compared the performance and demographic makeup of Chatham charter schools with our traditional public schools.

Victoria Mazur, a teacher from Siler City and vice president of the Chatham County Association of Educators, stated during public input that she and her organization were not opposed to charter schools, and praised the innovation and excellence of Chatham County’s charter schools. She stressed the need for a collaborative partnership between charter and traditional public schools so that they all could achieve excellence in education. She asked that the BOC consider a resolution that favors this collaborative effort to show support for charter schools and for reform of traditional public schools.

Superintendant Logan echoed Ms. Mazur, saying that he is not against charter schools, but that he wants what is best for all of Chatham’s children.  He asked for a resolution supporting reforms that remove restrictions from traditional public schools that prevent them from being innovative.

Sally Kost stated that she would not support the resolution as written. She elaborated that while traditional public schools have to account for and justify their budgets, charter schools are not held accountable for the tax dollars they are allotted per student. She also questioned the assertion that the demographic of charter school closely reflects that of traditional schools, and noted that transportation is not required by charter schools.

The resolution passed (3 to 2, with Cross and Kost dissenting). However, Chairman Bock pledged to coordinate with Ms. Mazur to write another resolution supporting collaboration and support for traditional public schools.

CCEC does not support the passing of a resolution that so strongly appears to favor charter schools over traditional schools, and we await the forthcoming resolution that we hope will state the BOC’s unanimous support for all of our children and all of our schools.

Back to top


State of the County

Chairman Bock started his State of the County address by admitting to a lack of experience in governance by the new board members, and graciously thanked staff for all their patience and help over the past year.

The chief achievements of the BOC that he touted were:

Tax Rate. Taxes were not raised last year, and no significant tax hike is foreseen for 2012. 
Chairman Bock thanked budget staff.  However, he did not acknowledge the BOC’s decision to postpone reevaluation of property values, which means that some citizens are paying taxes on higher evaluations than current market values.

Reduced spending. Although Chairman Bock admits that this initiative was tougher than he thought it would be, the BOC was able to reduce non-mandated spending by 15%, with over all cuts of 2%. As CCEC has reported over the past year, some of these cuts were unnecessary and controversial.

Streamlining. While CCEC favors common sense reductions in what can be a cumbersome process, we have been highly critical of any logistical changes that will reduce protections to the environment, water resources, and the health and well-being of Chatham citizens.

Open government. Chairman Bock claimed first-time statewide recognition for the BOC’s open government initiative without mentioning that it came from the John Locke Foundation, a conservative North Carolina think tank. While much of the what is currently accessible on the county website was also previously available, the newest open government intitiative is online video of Commissioner meetings, which allows those unable to attend in person to watch via the web or cable television.

Jobs. There is an upswing of new businesses in the county. CCEC supports the new pre-application meetings that county staff provide for people interested in opening new businesses. The increase in number of new applications appears to be local evidence of continuing improvement in the overall national economy.

Back to top


Joint Cary-Chatham Land-Use Plan

The Planning Board has formed a subcommittee of three members, with the help of planning staff, to review the Draft Plan. During their February meeting, two of these subcommittee members indicated that they wanted to hear public comments on the Plan, although they stressed that they were not interested in the public comments of citizens who speak out at public meetings. One member stated that he wants to hear what is being "whispered between the people." Perhaps we all need to start whispering?!

The BOC will continue to hold two meetings per month until the new budget year starts in August, since the decision to meet only once per month was part of the budget recommendations. However, they canceled their March 5th meeting for lack of an agenda.

Back to top

 

 
Chatham Citizens for Effective Communities (CCEC) and CCEC-Institute, Inc. is a not for profit, tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Donations are tax-deductible. CCEC, Inc. is a not for profit non tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.